• Headlines

    Constitutional Draft Leaves Tunisia's Future Political System in Limbo

    By Farah Samti | Nov 16 2012 Share on Linkedin Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google Share on pinterest Print

    Tags: Constitution , international institute for democracy and electoral assistance , intl' IDEA , main-national-featured , modified parliamentary ,

    The expert panel from Int’l IDAE

    The future of Tunisia’s political system is serving as a lightening rod for debate as members of the National Constituent Assembly (NCA) draft the nation’s constitution.

    During its 5th constitutional reform seminar, the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (Int’l IDEA) discussed potential future political systems in Tunisia, mainly focusing on the current semi-presidential system adopted by the ruling Troika – comprising Ennahdha, Congress for the Republic and Ettakatol.

    The constitutional draft as it stands does not define Tunisia’s political system. But it touches upon the separation of powers, specifying different possibilities for the prerogatives of the president, the prime minister, and the parliament.

    “We all agree that the political system we have and want is a modified-parliamentary one, not a semi-presidential one,” said legal expert and former head of Tunisia’s Higher Political Reform Council Yadh Ben Achour. “But we need to have a clear political philosophy that will govern our choices.”

    NCA representatives at the conference agreed that the NCA avoided naming Tunisia’s political system in the constitutional draft. Given that the current system is already a mixed one without precedent, the drafters chose to focus on powers within the executive and legislative branches and the relationship between them. Attendees argued that a modified parliamentary system reflects a political agreement that aims at accommodating the interests of the ruling Troika.

    “We are not here to provide official recommendations, but rather options. The NCA members are reacting, and we see progress,” said Zaid Al Ali, senior adviser on constitution building for Int’l IDEA.

    Sujit Choudhry from the Constitutional Center at New York University (NYU) School of Law explained that implementing a mixed political system might cause problems if the checks are not sufficient. “Constraints are built to limit danger,” he added.

    Some of the concerns raised by panel experts centered on how much power should be granted to Tunisia’s future president and parliament. Ben Achour suggested that Tunisians, looking to break away from its authoritarian past, have gotten carried away in their calls for limited presidential powers.

    “We’re exaggerating. We shouldn’t be too guarded,” he said.

    Choudhry said that Tunisians are heading towards a semi-presidential system. According to him, it is safer to have a president, who has less power than a prime minister. But if the president is powerful, the system tends to be unstable and might collapse, Choudhry argued.

    “That doesn’t mean that the president has a symbolic role. The president is elected directly by the people,” he said.

    Tunisian National Constituent Assembly

    When addressing such concerns, some solutions were suggested. Ben Achour argued that potential violations to presidential power should be solved through a constitutional court. “We have to use tools that are simple and efficient and avoid complicated ones,” he added.

    Moreover, Richard Stacey from NYU’s Constitutional Center explained that the legislative branch, which is the parliament, ought to be proactive in the deliberation of balance-of-power disputes among the different branches.

    Additionally, another pressing question was raised: why is it taking this long to write the new Constitution?

    Choudhry said that having unrealistic timelines creates unnecessary pressure that cannot be helpful.

    “Don’t forget what Tunisia has been through. These things take time.. They [members of the NCA] are getting to know each other and negotiate with each other… People shouldn’t worry that it’s not done yet. I’m sure you’ll get through this,” he said.

    The lively debate ended on an optimistic note. “The ongoing debate is a healthy sign,” Choudhry said.

  • By Farah Samti  / 
  • Topics






      Paul /

      At the end of all this rubbish talking will Tunisia be able to move on and develop this country as it should be. A wonderful Tourist place for tourist from all around the world. To do this we need a very big Them park on the par with Disney but of course It will be different in that we could call call Springtime Theme park named after the spring revolution in which Tunisia started. Let other business invest in this country it has so much potential. Let have Mac Donald and let have a better sat service than dream Box thank you

    1. exult49 /

      The mais reason why there are no indications about what kind of system Tunisia should have is very simple: NO VISION ! The present majority hide the main objective and won’t openly declare the fundamentalist project the have in mind. So they wish to have a no’ man’s land to intervene afterward ….. Their simple idea is the typical; wait and see. There’s nothing to see the tunisians should clearly demonstrate next June their firm opposition for such a tactics and finally get rid of them.

      • Gary /

        so tired of these islamophobic, conspirationist vomits from europeans. since the beginning of the revolution there has been a vibrant debate about what political system tunisia should have. ennahda and a bunch of other parties has called for a parliamentary system (like in UK), while CPR and some other parties have called for a semi-presidential system (like in France).

        so STOP talking about fundamentalism. Ben Ali was the fundamentalist. the tunisian islamists, even the most radical ones, are not half as violent and anti-democratic as was Ben Ali and his west-supported henchmen.

        why did you not criticize ben ali? why were you silent for so many years? why did europe support him until the very end of his dictatorship? you should answer the tunisian people this. come on, don’t hide yourself. don’t be a coward.

        the propaganda against tunisia is neo-colonial and islamophobic. yes, i said it. i don’t like to use harsh words like these, but i’m fed up with the lies and the hatred.

        it is neo-colonial because you think that, whenever arabs take matters into their own hands, and not under the leadership of white Europe, there can only be chaos, backwardness and misogyny.

        it is islamophobic because you ignore all the good things moderate muslims have done for democratizing tunisia and you choose only to focus on a couple of incidents that are not representative for the country. you don’t want to work with the good muslims because you hate all muslims.


    Popular posts


    Silent March In Memory of Aya


  • Play Video

    Tunisia's Launch of Truth and Dignity Commission

  • Play Video

    Tunisialive Living Tunisia

  • Play Video

    #FreeAzyz campaigners protest gets violent

  • Posts

    In Pictures

    • Carthage Theater Days statue display in downtown Tunis.

      Photo credit: Tristan Dreisbach, Tunisia Live
    • Carthage Theater Days statue display in downtown Tunis.

      Photo credit: Tristan Dreisbach, Tunisia Live
    • Carthage Theater Days statue display in downtown Tunis.

      Photo credit: Tristan Dreisbach, Tunisia Live
    • Carthage Theater Days statue display in downtown Tunis.

      Photo credit: Tristan Dreisbach, Tunisia Live
    • Carthage Theater Days statue display in downtown Tunis.

      Photo credit: Tristan Dreisbach, Tunisia Live
    • Carthage Theater Days statue display in downtown Tunis.

      Photo credit: Tristan Dreisbach, Tunisia Live
    • Carthage Theater Days statue display in downtown Tunis.

      Photo credit: Tristan Dreisbach, Tunisia Live

  • Opinions