• Headlines
    • First suspected Ebola case in Tunisia detected in Enfidha Airport
    • Tunisia beats Senegal 1-0 in African Cup of Nations Qualifying Match
    • Tunisian-Turkish agreement in higher education field signed
    • Amnesty International Tunisia publishes 10-point manifesto for legislative elections
    • Ban-Ki Moon Visit: “Upcoming elections will be crucial step for Tunisia’s future”
    • Germany donates 2,700 bulletproof vests to Tunisia’s Interior Ministry
    • ISIE: More than five million Tunisians registered for upcoming elections
    • Prime Minister Mehdi Jomaa calls for vigilance against persistent terrorist threat

    Human Rights and Cyber Security Under Debate in Tunisia

    By Emily Parker | Jun 17 2013 Share on Linkedin Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google Share on pinterest Print

    Tags: cyber security ,freedom online ,Human Rights ,Internet
    Robert Guerra of Citizen Lab. Image credit: Tunisia Live.

    Robert Guerra of Citizen Lab at Freedom Online 2013 in Tunis

    Experts from around the world met in Tunis today to address the difficult relationship between online security and the preservation of human rights. The panel discussion came at the beginning of the two-day Freedom Online 2013 conference hosted by Tunisia.

    The panel, at the Tunis Sheraton Hotel, was entitled “Cyber Security and Human Rights.” The two-hour discussion included experts hailing from India, Canada, Bosnia, and Sweden.

    The discussion centered around the relationship between cyber security and human rights. Speakers Anja Kovacs of the Internet of Democracy Project, Robert Guerra of Citizen Lab, Dunja Mijatović of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, and Johan Hallenborg of the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, discussed the tension between maintaining security (whether national or personal) and upholding international human rights standards.  [display_posts type="related" limit="3" position="right"]

    Panelists were in agreement that human rights and cyber security concerns need not be mutually exclusive.

    “We cannot enjoy our freedoms without security,” Johan Hallenborg explained.

    “By pitting human rights concerns against security, we may find ourselves with neither rights, nor security,” Dunja Mijatović added.

    At the same time, Anja Kovacs urged the need for a a narrower definition of what we refer to as “cyber security.”

    “We need far greater definitional clarity,” she said. “Cyber security has become the catch-all category for everything that might be wrong with the Internet.”

    She explained that fraud, child pornography, terrorism, and other broadly connected issues tend to be lumped together under the security umbrella, yet the nature of these concerns varies greatly.

    As a result, Kovacs alleged that fears concerning internet security become magnified and often blown out of proportion. She emphasized the need for evaluating security threats on a case-by-case basis and to respond appropriately.

    “We see measures that don’t necessarily need to be taken,” she stated. “Governments use the ‘bogey’ of cyber crime and security to justify all kinds of actions [infringing on human rights] without making clear how much of a threat there really is and if responses are both necessary and proportionate.”

    As a result, Guerra urged the need to procure independent data analyzing security threats.

    “If we don’t realize what the real threats are, we will make wrong assumptions, and we will have a false sense of security,” he explained.

    Panelists also agreed on the need for governments to cooperate internationally to ensure that maintaining security does not come at the expense of personal human rights.

    “There have been efforts within international organizations and civil society, but what is missing is understanding and a political will,” Mijatović stated.

    Yet, the question of how to best encourage this international coordination remained unresolved during the panel.

    “It might be the time to develop a global body to deal with these issues,” Kovacs suggested.

    At the same time, she expressed that creating such a body might be a “naive” aspiration, given that governments across the globe possess different interests, values, and priorities. [display_posts type="same_author" limit="3" position="right"]

    Guerra also addressed the role of regional diversity in affecting frameworks and attitudes towards internet freedoms and security.

    “For a long time, western countries have driven standards [of internet security] and have created norms and infrastructures,” Guerra expressed.

    As demographics have shifted, however, Guerra explained that a majority of internet users now reside in the “South and East, where other issues like religion play a more important role” than upholding human rights standards.

    As a result, he claimed that we now pass through a critical moment that will determine the future form and content of the Internet.

    “If we don’t get it right now, the Internet as we have known it will be a dream that has long faded,” he asserted.

    Guerra agreed that establishing a relationship between human rights and cyber security should be approached through an international framework. He added that, given historical precedent, such a task does not require starting from square one.

    “Let’s not forget that there are already international instruments” to regulate the relationship between human rights and cyber security, Guerra said. “We don’t have to create new things.” He referred to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as one such example.

    Kovacs agreed, adding that not only governments need to be involved, but also other actors, such as businesses and civil society.

    “Governments, institutions, and actors – both domestically and internationally – must keep each other in check because they need each other,” she explained.

    While the complex issues under discussion certainly were not solved at the conference, the forum was a unique opportunity to address these matters in a country where such a conversation would have been impossible prior to the January 2011 revolution.

    Share on Linkedin Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google Share on pinterest

  • By Emily Parker  / 
  • Topics

    People

    Organization

    Place

    Party

    Documents

    Events

    Related

  • Guide: Tunisia’s 2014 Legislative Elections
  • Oued Ellil: 5 Women, One Man Killed in Security Forces raid of terrorists’ home after militants fired AK 47s from inside the house. One of the children in the house was shot and is currently in the hospital, condition unknown. One man and one woman, both injured, have been arrested. One security officer has been injured. The operation, which began at 6am yesterday, has been declared over.
  • Tunisian Press Headlines: October 24, 2014
  • Election Watchdog Atide Highlights ISIE Irregularities
  • Shootings in Oued Ellil and Kebili Kill One Civilian, One Police Officer
  • Comments

    Tweets


    Videos

    Silent March In Memory of Aya

    ...

  • Play Video

    Tunisia's Launch of Truth and Dignity Commission

  • Play Video

    Tunisialive Living Tunisia

  • Play Video

    #FreeAzyz campaigners protest gets violent